did not want to dare, and open new paths. The statements, more or less veiled, that the "old" municipalities would remain, leaving no room for hope. They will always be above them and of course the central government of the Province, to influence, even heavily, the new Agency and its work.
The idea of \u200b\u200bdecentralization of powers and the administration is commendable, especially in this Province, Autonomous ensure compliance with the national government, but to centralize it. The intent, not so hidden, it would be noble and acceptable. What to bring together, over time, municipalities now too small and limited to provide services in a sustainable way. To achieve this goal, rather than encourage municipalities (with various systems, such as mandatory consortia when the budget is not adequate, laws that mandate the merger within a certain time, those below a certain number of inhabitants, or similar to those geographically close, and so on. etc..) merger, it was decided to create another entity, project structure in a very questionable.
Every valley or community has its own characteristics, we can not have a body intermediate Primiero with the same attributes, for example, the Val di Non Giudicarie. For dimensions and various values, such as the prevailing economy, the number of inhabitants and the environment. The biggest mistake is just this: fix the duties and powers (the same for all) of these spectral Community, it should carefully study the architecture constitutive downstream valley. Returning to Primiero, you had to proceed "inventing" something new, which crosses the stale logic of Municipalities. Representation divided by settlements and not to municipalities would have given more confidence to the doubtful and perplexed voter. The opportunity to give San Martino and the importance of the position of "town" and not a fraction, has been lost. Of course the same can apply to others, especially for the space, where there are the villages with all their problems and needs (Caoria, but not only). We accepted what has been imposed from above, claiming that it was not proper, so to say that it was tailored for us.
fly over here on the statements such as: - "is a no-cost reform" - "no charge" and so on. These statements are absolutely not credible. Briefly
on election programs that we have received and read these days: there are some basic statements and some more attention on specific locations to characterize and diversify programs and competitors. But if you read carefully we discover that the issues and proposals are all pretty similar. Very substantial differences, then.
found that the themes that will occupy the elect (roads, for example) are shared by virtually every program list, it was better to organize a "strip" where "men and women of good will" undertake? No, meet the suspicious and malicious. None
then tells us how and with what priority will be realized as scheduled. But what is more disconcerting is that the funds are not mentioned that you should draw on to implement the projects. The suspicion is that, once again, you will have to "procure" in the Province and then, politically, it is not advisable to deviate too much from the Executive and the Governor of the day. In the face of self! On the site of
"Aguaz" You can listen to interviews with candidates and the questions asked by some present.
The idea of \u200b\u200bdecentralization of powers and the administration is commendable, especially in this Province, Autonomous ensure compliance with the national government, but to centralize it. The intent, not so hidden, it would be noble and acceptable. What to bring together, over time, municipalities now too small and limited to provide services in a sustainable way. To achieve this goal, rather than encourage municipalities (with various systems, such as mandatory consortia when the budget is not adequate, laws that mandate the merger within a certain time, those below a certain number of inhabitants, or similar to those geographically close, and so on. etc..) merger, it was decided to create another entity, project structure in a very questionable.
Every valley or community has its own characteristics, we can not have a body intermediate Primiero with the same attributes, for example, the Val di Non Giudicarie. For dimensions and various values, such as the prevailing economy, the number of inhabitants and the environment. The biggest mistake is just this: fix the duties and powers (the same for all) of these spectral Community, it should carefully study the architecture constitutive downstream valley. Returning to Primiero, you had to proceed "inventing" something new, which crosses the stale logic of Municipalities. Representation divided by settlements and not to municipalities would have given more confidence to the doubtful and perplexed voter. The opportunity to give San Martino and the importance of the position of "town" and not a fraction, has been lost. Of course the same can apply to others, especially for the space, where there are the villages with all their problems and needs (Caoria, but not only). We accepted what has been imposed from above, claiming that it was not proper, so to say that it was tailored for us.
fly over here on the statements such as: - "is a no-cost reform" - "no charge" and so on. These statements are absolutely not credible. Briefly
on election programs that we have received and read these days: there are some basic statements and some more attention on specific locations to characterize and diversify programs and competitors. But if you read carefully we discover that the issues and proposals are all pretty similar. Very substantial differences, then.
found that the themes that will occupy the elect (roads, for example) are shared by virtually every program list, it was better to organize a "strip" where "men and women of good will" undertake? No, meet the suspicious and malicious. None
then tells us how and with what priority will be realized as scheduled. But what is more disconcerting is that the funds are not mentioned that you should draw on to implement the projects. The suspicion is that, once again, you will have to "procure" in the Province and then, politically, it is not advisable to deviate too much from the Executive and the Governor of the day. In the face of self! On the site of
"Aguaz" You can listen to interviews with candidates and the questions asked by some present.
0 comments:
Post a Comment