"The violation of the mandatory rules contained in art. 2103 cc implies the invalidity of the employer's decision to transfer the worker from the original manufacturing site to other production units and order the employer to reassign the employee - without prejudice to the exercise of jus variandi - the former home with the tasks already carried out, having to believe that, where is established the existence of conduct contrary to art. 2103 cc, the trial court, than to punish the breach of the contractual obligation assumed by the employer with an order to pay damages, may issue a ruling in a specific form of performance that - while not coercible or comparable to the order of reinstatement pursuant to Art. 18 Law 300 of 1970, a provision which has the characteristics of typical features, and exceptionalism are effective - in its content fully satisfatorio injured as a direct interest in removing the effects arising from the unlawful action "(Civil Cassation, sez. Lav., June 19, 2008 No 16689).
0 comments:
Post a Comment